<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon DSLR HD video filming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/</link>
	<description>Field Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:39:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yinchen</title>
		<link>http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/comment-page-1/#comment-6989</link>
		<dc:creator>Yinchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonfieldreviews.com/?p=52#comment-6989</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Thank you for sharing these reviews.
Have you ever used Canon 7D to record a video clip in 640*480 @ 60 fps? Do you know the bit depth of the video under that condition? I know the camera could take picture in 14-bit. Is it the same in the video, or reduced to 8-bit?
I&#039;ll really appreciate if you could reply:)
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Thank you for sharing these reviews.<br />
Have you ever used Canon 7D to record a video clip in 640*480 @ 60 fps? Do you know the bit depth of the video under that condition? I know the camera could take picture in 14-bit. Is it the same in the video, or reduced to 8-bit?<br />
I&#8217;ll really appreciate if you could reply:)<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: new canon slr</title>
		<link>http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>new canon slr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonfieldreviews.com/?p=52#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Your blog have many amazing content about slr camera. Thank you for share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog have many amazing content about slr camera. Thank you for share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wasili</title>
		<link>http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Wasili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonfieldreviews.com/?p=52#comment-113</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonfieldreviews.com/?p=52#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Hi, Wasili

I agree with your friend! Go for the 70-200/4 IS. It is lightweight, sharp and cheaper, and if you don&#039;t need f/2.8 the 4.0 is a very good choice..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Wasili</p>
<p>I agree with your friend! Go for the 70-200/4 IS. It is lightweight, sharp and cheaper, and if you don&#8217;t need f/2.8 the 4.0 is a very good choice..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wasili</title>
		<link>http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Wasili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonfieldreviews.com/?p=52#comment-110</guid>
		<description>May I kindly &quot;bother&quot; you with a question ... :-)

I will pick up the 7D tomorrow at the store - yippiieee - but I&#039;ve heard so many opinions about the 70-200/2.8 and a good friend of mine recommended the 70-200/4.0 IS USM due to the lighter weight and of course less €€€. I&#039;m not a pro like you, I just really enjoy photography as a hobby and was really looking forward owning my first L-lense. He said, that it&#039;s only one
aperture value from 2.8 to 4.0 and for the everyday use the f4.0 will totally do the job for me. I DO NOT have any specific things that I&#039;m gonna use it for (i.e. sports, cars, wildlife) ....so....  Your opinion if you don&#039;t mind/have a minute or two?

mange takk,

Wasili</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I kindly &#8220;bother&#8221; you with a question &#8230; <img src='http://canonfieldreviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I will pick up the 7D tomorrow at the store &#8211; yippiieee &#8211; but I&#8217;ve heard so many opinions about the 70-200/2.8 and a good friend of mine recommended the 70-200/4.0 IS USM due to the lighter weight and of course less €€€. I&#8217;m not a pro like you, I just really enjoy photography as a hobby and was really looking forward owning my first L-lense. He said, that it&#8217;s only one<br />
aperture value from 2.8 to 4.0 and for the everyday use the f4.0 will totally do the job for me. I DO NOT have any specific things that I&#8217;m gonna use it for (i.e. sports, cars, wildlife) &#8230;.so&#8230;.  Your opinion if you don&#8217;t mind/have a minute or two?</p>
<p>mange takk,</p>
<p>Wasili</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonfieldreviews.com/?p=52#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Hello Wasili

Good to hear that you liked the 7D review.
The lenses I use in the video is 70-200/2.8 and 300/2.8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Wasili</p>
<p>Good to hear that you liked the 7D review.<br />
The lenses I use in the video is 70-200/2.8 and 300/2.8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wasili</title>
		<link>http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Wasili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonfieldreviews.com/?p=52#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Hi!

I LOVE the 7D review. Just wondering if the lense you&#039;re using in this video is the EF 70-200 2.8 IS USM?

Cheers, Wasili</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>I LOVE the 7D review. Just wondering if the lense you&#8217;re using in this video is the EF 70-200 2.8 IS USM?</p>
<p>Cheers, Wasili</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonfieldreviews.com/?p=52#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Hello Me XMan &amp; Tom

As Kam says this is a RedRock rig with Follow Focus. I&#039;m testing different equipment for HD-video with Canon 5D Mark II and 7D. I will post some of my reviews on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Me XMan &amp; Tom</p>
<p>As Kam says this is a RedRock rig with Follow Focus. I&#8217;m testing different equipment for HD-video with Canon 5D Mark II and 7D. I will post some of my reviews on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me XMan</title>
		<link>http://canonfieldreviews.com/canon-dslr-hd-video-filming/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Me XMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonfieldreviews.com/?p=52#comment-54</guid>
		<description>What rig are you using with the camera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What rig are you using with the camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
